This paragraph is lucidly well-written, structured, clear, and persuasive. The language is strong, and the imagery speaks for itself as a powerful representation of his qualms regarding former President Trump's rhetoric and possible intentions. The paragraph engages and flows, holding interest from start to finish. The problem with the content of the paragraph lies in the fact that it makes very strong claims but does not back them with concrete evidence. Statements concerning Trump's alleged desire to establish a right-wing autocracy, with comparisons to dictators, are not supported by direct quotations or verified actions. Furthermore, because this paragraph is strongly based on the author's interpretation of what Trump says and does, it gives a certain bias and conjectural tone to the writing. The inclusion of verified facts would go a long way in making this argument credible, and the avoidance of conjecture and charged language would help in its delivery.